The article analyzes the views of scientists on the issue of liability. The author’s definition of the responsibility of research institutions.The attention absence of a single legal act, which would define the characteristic of such institutions responsible. It outlined the range of issues of improving accountability of research institutions.

It is proposed to understand under the responsibility of research institutions the means of state influence coercion on illegal actions of research institutions to prevent abuse last principle of legality, and if such a violation – to end illegal acts, restore violated rights and  citizens’ legitimate interests and rights.

In legal literature as the classic types of legal liability under the laws of Ukraine adopted a differentiated: Administrative responsibility; Disciplinary responsibility; Criminal liability;Civil liability;Constitutional responsibility;International legal responsibility;Financial responsibility.

Research institutions are legal entities with different legal form and ownership. The common feature of driving their activity – scientific research for the sake of scientific results. However, these institutions as entities may in its activities violate the established rules of functioning of various public institutions. And if these violations infringe on the established order by the law, they entail occurrence adequate liability. First of all it is necessary to determine which violations can be detected in the activities of research institutions, and thus to the kinds of responsibilities they can be drawn.

Key words: research institution, the responsibility of improving the problem, types of legal liability, citizens’ legitimate interests and rights, law.

References

1. Skakun O. F. Teoriia derzhavy i prava (entsyklopedychnyi kurs): [pidruchnyk]. Vydannia 2-he, pereroblene i dopovnene. Kharkiv: Espada, 2009. 752 s.
2. Administratyvna vidpovidalnist v Ukraini: navch. posib. / Kom-ziuk A. T., Humeniuk V. A., Dzhahupov H. V. ta in.; za zah. red. A. T. Komziuka. 3-tie vyd., doopr. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo Khark. nats. un-tu vnutr. sprav, 2007. 80 s.
3. Budko Z. M. Finansovo-pravova vidpovidalnist za vchynennia podatkovykh pravoporushen: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Zapo-rizhzhia, 2005. 258 s.
4. Basin K. V. Yurydychna vidpovidalnist: pryroda, formy reali-zatsii ta prava liudyny: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Kyiv, 2006. 214 s.
5. Zelena O. V. Sutnist yurydychnoi vidpovidalnosti ta rol pra-vookhoronnykh orhaniv u yii zabezpechenni: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Kyiv, 200. 215 s.
6. Iurydychna entsyklopediia: v 6 t. / redkol.: Shemshuchenko Yu. S. (holova redkol.) ta in. Kyiv: Yuryd. dumka, 2011. T. 1: A–H. 656 s.
7. Pro naukovu i naukovo-tekhnichnu diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.12.1991 № 1977-KhII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 1992. № 12. St. 165.
8. Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia: zakon Ukrainy vid 07.12.1984 № 8073-Kh. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrains-koi RSR. 1984. Dodatok do № 51. St. 1122.
9. Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.04.2001 № 2341-III. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2001. № 25–26. St. 131.
10. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 № 435-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2003. № 40–44. St. 356.
11. Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro Derzhavnyi reiestr naukovykh ustanov, yakym nadaietsia pidtrymka derzhavy : postanova Kabinetu Mini-striv Ukrainy vid 23.04.2001 № 380. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. 2001. № 17. St. 751. S. 140. Kod akta 18546/2001.
12. Finansove pravo: pidruchnyk / M. P. Kucheriavenko, D. O. Bilinskyi, O. O. Dmytryk ta in.; za red. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof. M. P. Kucheriavenka. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2013. 400 s.
13. Kodeks zakoniv pro pratsiu Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 10.12.1971 № 322-VIII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady URSR. 1971. Doda-tok do № 50.