The article explores the significance of historical and axiological approaches in modern jurisprudence as a reaction to the crisis of normative thinking that ignores the value and historical dimension of law. The essence of the historical approach as a means of understanding law in the context of its genesis, social and cultural conditioning, and the evolution of legal forms, is revealed. The necessity to combine historical and axiological approaches for the formation of an ethically oriented, self-reflective jurisprudence capable of critically evaluating current legislation and contributing to the establishment of the rule of law is substantiated. The combination of historical and axiological approaches forms complex methodological boundaries that allow not only to describe and systematize law, but also to critically understand it. This approach allows a lawyer to think not only in terms of legal technique, but also in terms of legitimacy, value justification, and historical relevance of law.

It is summarized that modern jurisprudence requires rethinking of its own methodological principles, in particular, by setting off from the normative paradigm that has long dominated in legal science. The historical and axiological approaches, each in its own way, return law to its origins – as a product of cultural experience and a carrier of basic social values. Their combination opens up prospects for a deeper, critical, and holistic understanding of law not only as a system of norms, but as a phenomenon rooted in the collective memory and moral order of society. The actualization of these approaches not only enriches legal methodology, but also contributes to the establishment of the rule of law based on respect for dignity, historical continuity and ethical meaning of law

Key words: axiological approach, historical school of law, historical approach, methodology of law, normativism, law, rule of law.

References

1. Falkovskyi, A.O. (2011), Axiological approach in the methodology of modern jurisprudence: author’s abstract of the dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences: 12.00.12, Odesa.
2. Kuchuk, A.M. (2016), “Axiological approach to the study of legal phenomena”, Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, Vol. 9, PP.116-20.
3. Dzioban, O.P. and Yarotskyi, V.L. (2018), “Sociological and axiological directions of modern legal research: general vision”, Information and Law, Vol.1, PP. 5-13.
4. Zelenko, I.P. (2022), “Special methods of research of state-legal phenomena: a modern view”, Scientific Notes, Vol.13, PP.9-14.
5. Skliar, S.S. (2022), “Interdisciplinarity in legal science: problems and prospects”, New Ukrainian Law, Vol.6, PP.148-56.
6. Torop, M. (2024), “Methodology of research of legal responsibility in the works of Ukrainian legal scholars in the late 19th–early 20th centuries”, in: Conference Proceedings of ISPC, PP.165-66.
7. Dolhoruchenko, K. (2019), “Historical-legal approach in the methodology of studying the activity of the Reich Ministry of Education and Propaganda’s special department ‘Wieneta’ in the occupied Ukrainian territories”, Legal Bulletin, Vol..4, PP.161-66.
8. Koziubra, M. (2014), “Methodology of jurisprudence and methodology of law: correlation of concepts and their features”, Law of Ukraine, Vol.1, PP.22-32.
9. Agrawal, A. (2024), “Volksgeist Theory”, available at: https://lawbhoomi.com/volksgeist-theory/ (accessed 22 Мау 2025).
10. Kuchuk, A.M. (2023), Law in the postmodern era: legal discourse, Yuridyka Publishing House, Odesa, 130 р.
11. Serrebro, M.V. (2019), “Axiological approach in jurisprudence”, in: Oborotov, Yu.M. (Ed.), Methodology and innovation in general theoretical jurisprudence, Feniks Publishing House, Odesa, PP.80-95.